Freezing 5.6M Dormant BTC Could Be 'Worst Single-Day Repricing in Bitcoin's History,' Critics Warn

BIP-361, drafted by Jameson Lopp and other core devs, would phase out Bitcoin's current cryptographic signatures and freeze ~5.6M dormant BTC (~$440B, 28% of supply) to protect them from quantum attacks. Critics say it would shatter Bitcoin's core value prop in a single day.

Abstract blue-purple lattice over a glowing Bitcoin sigil, evoking a quantum threat to dormant supply.
BIP-361 forces Bitcoin to choose: confiscate 28% of supply for safety, or accept future quantum risk.

The Bitcoin community is in open civil war over BIP-361, a proposal that would phase out the network's current cryptographic signatures and effectively freeze any coins that fail to migrate — including roughly 5.6 million dormant BTC, worth around $440 billion at current prices.

The quantum case

BIP-361 author Jameson Lopp argues that quantum computing will eventually break Bitcoin's secp256k1 curve, and that he would rather see ~28% of all bitcoin frozen by the network than left for future quantum attackers to drain on-chain. The proposal contemplates a multi-phase migration to post-quantum signatures, with hard deadlines after which legacy outputs become unspendable. The 5.6 million figure roughly matches the BTC that has not moved in over a decade — the so-called Satoshi-era dormant supply.

The market case against

Critics — led by maximalists and several top exchanges — argue the cure is worse than the disease. Their thesis: Bitcoin's value proposition rests on unconditional, censorship-resistant ownership. Freezing 5.6M coins, even for a safety reason, breaks that promise the moment it ships. One widely shared rebuttal: "the repricing would be instant, not gradual, and it would be the worst single day in bitcoin's history — not because of a hack, but because the network will have proven its core value proposition is negotiable."

Freezing dormant BTC would trigger worst single-day repricing in bitcoin's history, says maximalist
CoinDesk lays out the maximalist case against BIP-361 and the market dynamics that make any forced freeze a credibility event.

Our Take

BIP-361 is a stress test of what Bitcoin actually is. If the chain proves itself willing to confiscate even provably lost coins to defend the network, it makes future, narrower interventions politically thinkable — and that is the part the maximalist camp can't abide. Watch Adam Back's optional-upgrade counter-proposal from April 16; it is the most credible compromise path and the likeliest version of post-quantum migration to actually ship — if anything ships at all.

Daily Web3 × AI intel, straight to your inbox. Subscribe to BlockAI News.

Keep Reading

Study: Grok Is the Most Likely Major AI to Reinforce User Delusions

Study: Grok Is the Most Likely Major AI to Reinforce User Delusions

A new study from the City University of New York and King's College London finds that xAI's Grok 4.1 Fast is the most prone of the major AI chatbots to reinforce delusions, paranoia and dangerous self-harm framing, according to Decrypt.

The setup

Researchers tested five frontier chatbots: Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic), GPT-5.2 Instant (OpenAI), GPT-4o (OpenAI), Gemini 3 Pro (Google) and Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI). They ran prompts involving delusions, paranoia and suicidal ideation, then graded how each model validated or

Read full story →

Stay Ahead of the Market

Daily AI & crypto briefings — straight to your inbox, your phone, and your timeline.